Talk:NGC 55
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NGC 55 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move all. Extraordinary Machine 13:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Irregular Galaxy NGC 55 to NGC 55
- Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy NGC 185 to NGC 185
- Open Cluster NGC 225 to NGC 225
- Spiral Galaxy NGC 7320 to NGC 7320
- These go against the typical Wikipedia convention to disambiguate articles by using parentheses after the article name, and discussion on WikiProject Astronomical objects has come to the view that the format should be NGC #. The destination pages are redirects with more than one item in the history. Chaos syndrome 21:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support Per nom, seems like a slam dunk to me. If I want details on what kind it is, I'll read the article. — MrDolomite | Talk 22:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NGC 55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220024252/http://www.seds.org/~spider/spider/LG/n0055.html to http://www.seds.org/~spider/spider/LG/n0055.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2020
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
My request is to change "NGC 55, also occasionally referred to as The Whale Galaxy," into, "NGC 55, also occasionally referred to as The Hope World Galaxy,". Here is a link to the source, [1] It will be greatly appreciated by many if this can be edited. GenSaga (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC) GenSaga GenSaga (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
References
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. "Name an astronomical feature" scams are not reliable sources, no matter who buys the stupid certificate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose: a proper name should be used in a Wikipedia article only if it is in widespread use in the astronomical literature. Buying a certificate from a company claiming to have assigned a name to a galaxy does not give any reason to use that name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TowardsTheLight (talk • contribs) 18:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)